J 2025

On the Need to Rethink the Way We Understand Growth: Media Evidence on Economic Growth as an Empty Signifier

PROFANT, Tomáš Imrich and Martin KARAS

Basic information

Original name

On the Need to Rethink the Way We Understand Growth: Media Evidence on Economic Growth as an Empty Signifier

Authors

PROFANT, Tomáš Imrich and Martin KARAS

Edition

Human Affairs, 2025, 1210-3055

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Article in a journal

Field of Study

50601 Political science

Country of publisher

Germany

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 0.600 in 2024

Marked to be transferred to RIV

Yes

Organization unit

Ambis University

Keywords in English

economic growth; empty signifier; Laclau; sedimentation; reactivation; media

Tags

Changed: 10/3/2026 16:36, Ing. Kateřina Lendrová

Abstract

In the original language

This paper argues that economic growth is an empty signifier and, on this basis, calls for a different approach to economic growth. It is based on an analysis of Czech and Slovak alternative and mainstream media, as well as interviews with journalists and columnists writing for these media. The article demonstrates that economic growth, as a media term, lacks clarity, is generally perceived positively, constitutes a systemic limit, and is surrounded by emotionally charged narratives and a chain of equivalences. Additionally, economic growth unites opposing forces in society and integrates incompatible discursive elements. It is sedimented into ob- jectivity, reinforced by a lack of knowledge about economic growth, the constraints of news and interview genres, and the subordination of critique to the expectations of readers, editors, and the ideological positioning of centrist media institutions. However, the dominance of economic growth is questioned in the interviews. Ac- cording to the respondents, reactivation is possible by including sources critical of growth in news or opinion sections or by selecting topics that conflict with the growth agenda.